Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264296AbUD0TFW (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:05:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264297AbUD0TFW (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:05:22 -0400 Received: from piedra.unizar.es ([155.210.11.65]:5316 "EHLO relay.unizar.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264296AbUD0TDf (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:03:35 -0400 From: "Jorge Bernal (Koke)" Reply-To: koke@sindominio.net To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:03:21 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Grzegorz Kulewski References: <20040427165819.GA23961@valve.mbsi.ca> <200404271854.i3RIsdaP017849@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <200404271854.i3RIsdaP017849@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404272103.21925.koke_lkml@amedias.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 796 Lines: 17 On Martes, 27 de Abril de 2004 20:54, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:53:39 +0200, Grzegorz Kulewski said: > > Maybe kernel should display warning only once per given licence or even > > once per boot (who needs warning about tainting tainted kernel?) > > If your kernel is tainted by 3 different modules, it saves you 2 reboots > when trying to replicate a problem with an untainted kernel. > what about something like a /proc/tainted list of modules? > Other than that, there's probably no reason to complain on a re-taint. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/