Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264678AbUD1Fv3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:51:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264682AbUD1Fv3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:51:29 -0400 Received: from tartu.cyber.ee ([193.40.6.68]:4619 "EHLO tartu.cyber.ee") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264678AbUD1Fv1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:51:27 -0400 From: Meelis Roos To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional namespace to ReiserFS In-Reply-To: <408E9F42.2080804@namesys.com> User-Agent: tin/1.7.4-20040225 ("Benbecula") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.6-rc2 (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:51:29 +0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 845 Lines: 19 HR> V4 fixed all of V3's serious performance flaws, and totally obsoletes HR> it. I am very happy with it. So if you consider it obsolete and not interesting any more, why not hand the de jure maintainership over to Chris? He has been the de facto mainatainer for a long time. I find that Reiserfs V3 has just become mature enough in the last half a year to actually trust my data to it - maybe even on non-x86. Reiserfs V4 would take some years to gain this trust so I see a real potential user base for V3 and refusing further development of it seems unwise. -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/