Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264725AbUD1KmE (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 06:42:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264731AbUD1KmE (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 06:42:04 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]:1923 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264725AbUD1KmB (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 06:42:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 05:41:10 -0500 From: "Jose R. Santos" To: Andrew Morton Cc: Nick Piggin , corbet@lwn.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext3 inode cache eats system, news at 11 Message-ID: <20040428104110.GU2995@rx8.ibm.com> References: <20040426171856.22514.qmail@lwn.net> <20040426181235.2b5b62c8.akpm@osdl.org> <408DD2D5.1040306@yahoo.com.au> <20040426210237.788045cf.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In-Reply-To: <20040426210237.788045cf.akpm@osdl.org> (from akpm@osdl.org on Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 23:02:37 -0500) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.0.16 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1412 Lines: 33 On 04/26/04 23:02:37, Andrew Morton wrote: > Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.6-rc2/2.6.6-rc2-mm2/broken-out/slab-order-0-for-vfs-caches.patch > > > > > > is not a completely happy solution, but it should fix things up. > > > > Another thing you could be doing is not zeroing swapper->nr > > if the shrinker function doesn't do anything, in order to try > > to maintain pressure on the dcache. This would be similar to > > your deferred list idea. > > Am now doing this. > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.6-rc2/2.6.6-rc2-mm2/broken-out/shrink_slab-handle-GFP_NOFS.patch Hi Andrew, I've been fighting a similar problem to this one on a SpecSFS setup that Im running and it seems that this patch fixes it. While I was trying several other patches at the time (all of them not dcache related) and its hard right now to measure the exact improvement percentage, I would guess that these patches provides at least a 11% improvement on my 64GB machine. BTW: I was using JFS on my setup. Thanks -JRS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/