Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261610AbUD1TYv (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:24:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261321AbUD1TYj (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:24:39 -0400 Received: from kinesis.swishmail.com ([209.10.110.86]:4624 "EHLO kinesis.swishmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265002AbUD1RdA (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:33:00 -0400 Message-ID: <408FEBCA.70607@techsource.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:37:14 -0400 From: Timothy Miller MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Boucher CC: David Gibson , lkml - Kernel Mailing List , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license References: <20040427165819.GA23961@valve.mbsi.ca> <1083107550.30985.122.camel@bach> <47B669B0-98A7-11D8-85DF-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> <20040428002516.GC3272@zax> <677BC9FC-98B1-11D8-85DF-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> In-Reply-To: <677BC9FC-98B1-11D8-85DF-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1674 Lines: 41 Marc Boucher wrote: > > > In an enterprise, customers always come first. Nonetheless, I don't > believe that this issue had a significant impact on kernel developers. > Had their support burden been significantly increased by our products, > the issue would have come up much sooner. > This has all deteriorated into childish bickering rather than meaningful debate. The problem is that Linuxant or whoever has done something which is misleading and violates a tenet of the GPL and the module interface of the Linux kernel. There may be technical reasons which excuse this, but in the end, Linuxant needs to correct their (unintentional) error and move on. In this society, if you violate copyright and get caught, you get slammed. You've been caught and slammed. Fortunately, no one is suing you over it. But spending your time arguing about it rather than making it right is only making you look like a jerk. At this point, no one cares about your excuses for why you did it -- excuses accepted, technical reasons understood, we don't blame you for what you did in the PAST. If I were in your position, I would say, "I'm sorry. I understand the problem, and I will fix it as soon as possible." THAT would be a professional and ethical thing to do. It's also a good way to get on the GOOD side of the Linux community. Everyone makes mistakes; what matters is how they DEAL with those mistakes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/