Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261932AbUD1T5Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:57:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261982AbUD1T47 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:56:59 -0400 Received: from [66.62.77.7] ([66.62.77.7]:63196 "EHLO mail.gurulabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265019AbUD1Rom (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:44:42 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.5, IPSec, NAT funnies From: Dax Kelson To: Aidas Kasparas Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <408F5555.3080303@gmc.lt> References: <1083133394.2817.40.camel@mentor.gurulabs.com> <408F5555.3080303@gmc.lt> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1083174347.2803.9.camel@mentor.gurulabs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-1) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:45:47 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 742 Lines: 19 On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 00:55, Aidas Kasparas wrote: > Kernel bug. IPSec changes ip headers, but fails to say about this to > conntrack. More information > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=215980 > Patch at > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi/ipsec_conntrack.diff?bug=215980&msg=3&att=1 A 7 month old kernel bug with a patch. Is there any reason why this hasn't been rolled into the Linus tree yet? Is the something objectionable with the patch? Dax Kelson Guru Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/