Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262103AbUD2AKb (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:10:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262113AbUD2AKb (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:10:31 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:2262 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262103AbUD2AK3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:10:29 -0400 Message-ID: <409047E6.5000505@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:10:14 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: brettspamacct@fastclick.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ~500 megs cached yet 2.6.5 goes into swap hell References: <409021D3.4060305@fastclick.com> <20040428170106.122fd94e.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040428170106.122fd94e.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1520 Lines: 38 Andrew Morton wrote: > Swapout is good. It frees up unused memory. I run my desktop machines at > swappiness=100. The definition of "unused" is quite subjective and app-dependent... I've see reports with increasing frequency about the swappiness of the 2.6.x kernels, from people who were already annoyed at the swappiness of 2.4.x kernels :) Favorite pathological (and quite common) examples are the various 4am cron jobs that scan your entire filesystem. Running that process overnight on a quiet machines practically guarantees a huge burst of disk activity, with unwanted results: 1) Inode and page caches are blown away 2) A lot of your desktop apps are swapped out Additionally, a (IMO valid) maxim of sysadmins has been "a properly configured server doesn't swap". There should be no reason why this maxim becomes invalid over time. When Linux starts to swap out apps the sysadmin knows will be useful in an hour, or six hours, or a day just because it needs a bit more file cache, I get worried. There IMO should be some way to balance the amount of anon-vma's such that the sysadmin can say "stop taking 70% of my box's memory for disposable cache, use it instead for apps you would otherwise swap out, you memory-hungry kernel you." Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/