Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262311AbUD2Au1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:50:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262316AbUD2Au1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:50:27 -0400 Received: from mail.fastclick.com ([205.180.85.17]:46828 "EHLO mail.fastclick.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262311AbUD2AuO (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:50:14 -0400 Message-ID: <40905127.3000001@fastclick.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:49:43 -0700 From: "Brett E." Reply-To: brettspamacct@fastclick.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ~500 megs cached yet 2.6.5 goes into swap hell References: <409021D3.4060305@fastclick.com> <20040428170106.122fd94e.akpm@osdl.org> <409047E6.5000505@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <409047E6.5000505@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1835 Lines: 47 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > >> Swapout is good. It frees up unused memory. I run my desktop >> machines at >> swappiness=100. > > > > The definition of "unused" is quite subjective and app-dependent... > > I've see reports with increasing frequency about the swappiness of the > 2.6.x kernels, from people who were already annoyed at the swappiness of > 2.4.x kernels :) > > Favorite pathological (and quite common) examples are the various 4am > cron jobs that scan your entire filesystem. Running that process > overnight on a quiet machines practically guarantees a huge burst of > disk activity, with unwanted results: > 1) Inode and page caches are blown away > 2) A lot of your desktop apps are swapped out > > Additionally, a (IMO valid) maxim of sysadmins has been "a properly > configured server doesn't swap". There should be no reason why this > maxim becomes invalid over time. When Linux starts to swap out apps the > sysadmin knows will be useful in an hour, or six hours, or a day just > because it needs a bit more file cache, I get worried. > > There IMO should be some way to balance the amount of anon-vma's such > that the sysadmin can say "stop taking 70% of my box's memory for > disposable cache, use it instead for apps you would otherwise swap out, > you memory-hungry kernel you." > > Jeff Or how about "Use ALL the cache you want Mr. Kernel. But when I want more physical memory pages, just reap cache pages and only swap out when the cache is down to a certain size(configurable, say 100megs or something)." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/