Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262422AbUD2Cgr (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:36:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262434AbUD2Cgr (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:36:47 -0400 Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net ([212.159.14.213]:6670 "EHLO ptb-relay02.plus.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262422AbUD2Cgq (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:36:46 -0400 Message-ID: <40906A35.3090004@mauve.plus.com> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:36:37 +0100 From: Ian Stirling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Boucher CC: Rik van Riel , Timothy Miller , lkml - Kernel Mailing List , Rusty Russell , David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license References: <4150E18A-9985-11D8-85DF-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> In-Reply-To: <4150E18A-9985-11D8-85DF-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 626 Lines: 17 Marc Boucher wrote: > > Hi Rik, > > Your new proposed message sounds much clearer to the ordinary mortal and > would imho be a significant improvement. Perhaps printing repetitive > warnings for identical $MODULE_VENDOR strings could also be avoided, > taking care of the redundancy/volume problem as well.. Is this worth 100 or 200 bytes of code though? I'd have to say no. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/