Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262468AbUD2Crj (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:47:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262470AbUD2Cri (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:47:38 -0400 Received: from mail48-s.fg.online.no ([148.122.161.48]:17342 "EHLO mail48-s.fg.online.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262468AbUD2Crg (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:47:36 -0400 From: Kenneth =?iso-8859-1?q?Aafl=F8y?= To: Ian Stirling Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 04:47:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4150E18A-9985-11D8-85DF-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> <40906A35.3090004@mauve.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <40906A35.3090004@mauve.plus.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404290447.30154.keaafloy@online.no> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 840 Lines: 21 On Thursday 29 April 2004 04:36, you wrote: > Marc Boucher wrote: > > Hi Rik, > > > > Your new proposed message sounds much clearer to the ordinary mortal and > > would imho be a significant improvement. Perhaps printing repetitive > > warnings for identical $MODULE_VENDOR strings could also be avoided, > > taking care of the redundancy/volume problem as well.. > > Is this worth 100 or 200 bytes of code though? > I'd have to say no. 1000-2000(?) instructions to display the message and some x(?) instructions to check if it's been reported before, yeah, i'd have to say no too. ;) Kenneth - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/