Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263665AbUD2ITF (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2004 04:19:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263671AbUD2ITF (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2004 04:19:05 -0400 Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.150]:11724 "EHLO mtagate1.de.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263665AbUD2ITA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2004 04:19:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390 (6/6): oprofile for s390. To: Philippe Elie Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 July 24, 2002 Message-ID: From: Martin Schwidefsky Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:18:38 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D12ML062/12/M/IBM(Release 6.0.2CF2|July 23, 2003) at 29/04/2004 10:18:39 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 792 Lines: 26 > > +#if defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE) || defined(CONFIG_OPROFILE_MODULE) > > this must depend on CONFIG_PROFILING ? Currently oprofile is the only profiling method implemented for s390. So this doesn't really change much. But in principle you are right, as soon as a second profiling method gets added this would have to be changed to CONFIG_PROFILING. blue skies, Martin Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Sch?naicherstr. 220, D-71032 B?blingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247 E-Mail: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/