Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264866AbUD2PSy (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:18:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264755AbUD2PSy (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:18:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:21639 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264881AbUD2POz (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:14:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:14:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: Timothy Miller cc: Marc Boucher , lkml - Kernel Mailing List , Rusty Russell , David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license In-Reply-To: <40911C01.80609@techsource.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 835 Lines: 22 On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Timothy Miller wrote: > > "Due to $MOD_FOO's license ($BLAH), the Linux kernel community > > cannot resolve problems you may encounter. Please contact > > $MODULE_VENDOR for support issues." > > Sounds very "politically correct", but certainly more descriptive and > less alarming. More importantly, it directs the support burden to where it, IMHO, belongs. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/