Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:10:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@sgi.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Erik Jacobson <erikj@subway.americas.sgi.com>,
       Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Process Aggregates (PAGG) support for the 2.6 kernel
In-Reply-To: <20040426174102.S22989@build.pdx.osdl.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404291708060.9152-100000@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1162
Lines: 31

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Chris Wright wrote:

> > Quite possibly.  Do you have a pointer to the latest bits/design docs?
> 
> Nothing aside from what's on ckrm.sf.net.  I know they've been retooling
> it a bit, but I'm not up on the current status.

Shailabh posted the latest CKRM code to lkml yesterday.

CKRM + rcfs seems to be slightly more capable than the PAGG code;
furthermore, CKRM already has a number of resource controller
modules while I'm only seeing very basic PAGG infrastructure.

Now would be a good time to join forces...

I admit that the CKRM project so far seems to have been mostly
an IBM internal project, but since there is community interest
it'd be time to get the community involved.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/