Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264853AbUD2V1W (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:27:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264970AbUD2VYS (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:24:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:28823 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264738AbUD2VU4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:20:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:20:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: Erik Jacobson cc: Christoph Hellwig , Paul Jackson , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Process Aggregates (PAGG) support for the 2.6 kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 916 Lines: 21 On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Erik Jacobson wrote: > If you're saying there really is zero chance even if I implement all the > suggestions and have things that use it, I guess I'll just have to live > with that (what's my other choice? :). I suspect there's a rather good chance of merging a common PAGG/CKRM infrastructure, since they pretty much do the same thing at the core and they both have different functionality implemented on top of the core process grouping. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/