Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263941AbUD3GNN (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:13:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265065AbUD3GNN (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:13:13 -0400 Received: from fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com ([66.185.86.72]:50980 "EHLO fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263941AbUD3GNJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:13:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:13:05 -0400 From: Sean Estabrooks To: Marc Boucher Cc: koke@sindominio.net, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, torvalds@osdl.org, miller@techsource.com, paul@wagland.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license Message-Id: <20040430021305.6814f29e.seanlkml@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <6FD0ADAF-9A69-11D8-B83D-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> References: <4FE43C97-9A20-11D8-B804-000A95CD704C@wagland.net> <4091757B.3090209@techsource.com> <200404292347.17431.koke_lkml@amedias.org> <0CAE0144-9A2C-11D8-B83D-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> <20040429195553.4fba0da7.seanlkml@rogers.com> <3A39091E-9A4C-11D8-B83D-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> <20040430004344.663acf90.seanlkml@rogers.com> <6FD0ADAF-9A69-11D8-B83D-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> Organization: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9-gtk2-20040229 (GTK+ 2.2.4; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.103.219.176] using ID at Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:12:16 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1393 Lines: 29 On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:44:24 -0400 Marc Boucher wrote: > There are major chipset vendors out there who have managed to become > market leaders while not providing any drivers for Linux. > > But other vendors are also still releasing new native linux drivers, > despite the availability of our solutions (Intel's project for Centrino > > This essentially proves that we are not removing the incentive to do > proper native drivers, simply providing more options for 1) people who > would otherwise be stuck or unable to use the full functionality of > their machines under Linux right now, and 2) vendors who are not able > to afford or justify the cost of developing native linux drivers due to > the size of the current Linux desktop market. In general these vendors > plan to one day produce native drivers, once the numbers make it > possible. That's not how you pitch it on your website. For instance, how many sales does Intel's Centrino project lose because you make non GPL-friendly hardware viable under Linux? Anyway, no matter how sure you are of your position, it doesn't justify what you did. Sean. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/