Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265228AbUD3PXI (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:23:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265229AbUD3PXI (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:23:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:11733 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265228AbUD3PXG (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:23:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:22:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Erik Jacobson , Paul Jackson , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Process Aggregates (PAGG) support for the 2.6 kernel In-Reply-To: <20040430140611.A11636@infradead.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 789 Lines: 19 On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Again, pagg doesn't even play in that league. It's really just a tiny > meachnism to allow a kernel module keep per-process data. Policies like > process-groups can be implemented on top of that. So basically you're arguing that PAGG is better because it doesn't do what's needed ? ;) -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/