Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263628AbUD3Pwz (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:52:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264106AbUD3Pwy (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:52:54 -0400 Received: from kinesis.swishmail.com ([209.10.110.86]:14606 "EHLO kinesis.swishmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263628AbUD3Pwx (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:52:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4092776A.5020705@techsource.com> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:57:30 -0400 From: Timothy Miller MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean Estabrooks CC: Marc Boucher , koke@sindominio.net, paul@wagland.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, riel@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license References: <4FE43C97-9A20-11D8-B804-000A95CD704C@wagland.net> <4091757B.3090209@techsource.com> <200404292347.17431.koke_lkml@amedias.org> <0CAE0144-9A2C-11D8-B83D-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> <20040429195553.4fba0da7.seanlkml@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <20040429195553.4fba0da7.seanlkml@rogers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1353 Lines: 37 Sean Estabrooks wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:24:58 -0400 > Marc Boucher wrote: > > > >>I think that Rik is right when saying that the key information that >>should be conveyed is who is responsible for providing support. The >>wording should be kept neutral, without negative connotation nor >>religious bias. > > > Perhaps others on this list are getting as tired as I am of your using > the term "religious bias" as a negative connotation against people who > support and protect the open source nature of Linux. Maybe you could > at least pretend to respect the people who you supposedly apologized to. Quite true. This isn't about religion. It's about people's right to choose how they license their the code they write. This is about copyright law and our right to choose what others we can do with what we have copyrighted. While I agree that there is a political agenda behind the GPL, we have to respect the rights of those who choose to apply it as a license to their creative works. And furthermore, having a political agenda is not inherently wrong. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/