Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265218AbUD3S7I (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:59:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264993AbUD3S7I (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:59:08 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72]:34092 "EHLO sj-iport-3.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265219AbUD3S7F (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:59:05 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Hua Zhong" To: "'Timothy Miller'" Cc: "'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz'" , "'Peter Williams'" , "'Marc Boucher'" , "'Sean Estabrooks'" , "'Linus Torvalds'" , "'Paul Wagland'" , "'Rik van Riel'" , , "'Rusty Russell'" , "'lkml - Kernel Mailing List'" , "'David Gibson'" Subject: RE: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:58:48 -0700 Organization: Cisco Systems Message-ID: <009e01c42ee5$2e89fc80$ca41cb3f@amer.cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <40929F5B.9090603@techsource.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1344 Lines: 33 > WINE is a user process. It does not run in kernel space, so we don't > care about it. Since all the closed-source stuff, like > Office, runs in user space, it CANNOT corrupt the kernel (barring real > kernel bugs). > > I think Linus needs to smack you down like he did with that guy who > couldn't understand the distinction between firmware and a > kernel driver. I think he doesn't, because he can read what other said. I know what distinction it is and I've been working on kernel for years since I was still in school. I'm not arguing about the taint issue, or any technical issue, as clearly stated in my last paragraph. I am mearly responding to the questioning to Linuxant's business model. > As long as the kernel is protected, we are generally in favor of it. > > > Linuxant did a wrong thing by working around the warning > > message, but I don't think it's fair to accuse of their business > > because they allow binary drivers run on Linux. > > The fact that binary drivers are "evil" does not reflect badly on > Linuxant, in my opinion. It doesn't look like so to me. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/