Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265248AbUD3UCd (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:02:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265249AbUD3UCc (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:02:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.mailblocks.com ([140.174.9.93]:55940 "HELO smtp3.mailblocks.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265248AbUD3UC1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:02:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:02:17 -0700 From: Keith D Burgess Jr Message-Id: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Priority: 3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1027 Lines: 27 >>And I agree we should stop this thread now. One thing that seems consistent here is that most agree on this point. To add a bit of comedy, picture this at the place you work: Mistakenly, a broadcast email goes out to everyone (ooops should have restricted the total number of users in the to/cc/bcc fields). Then your IT security group sends out a broadcast telling everyone to delete it and not to "reply to all." You continue to get people replying to all with the body as below: "Didn't you see the IT security bulletin? It said not to reply to all but to delete this email!" I am sensing that is what we are all doing here :) (myself included). ---------------------------------------------- Mailblocks - A Better Way to Do Email http://about.mailblocks.com/info - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/