Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261298AbUD3VYB (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:24:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261179AbUD3VVy (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:21:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:20893 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261184AbUD3VSU (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:18:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:16:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: Marc Boucher cc: Timothy Miller , "'Sean Estabrooks'" , "'Paul Wagland'" , "'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz'" , "'Peter Williams'" , Hua Zhong , "'lkml - Kernel Mailing List'" , , "'Rusty Russell'" , Linus Torvalds , "'David Gibson'" Subject: Re: A compromise that could have been reached. Re: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license In-Reply-To: <58E313D6-9AEA-11D8-B83D-000A95BCAC26@linuxant.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 788 Lines: 20 On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Marc Boucher wrote: > Hopefully the community will view this as an acceptable compromise. > Once patches have propagated onto people's computers, we will be happy > to remove all \0's completely. I didn't see any patches. Does that mean you plan to continue your potential violation of copyright law forever ? -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/