Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261419AbUD3Vf7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:35:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261430AbUD3Vf7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:35:59 -0400 Received: from [12.177.129.25] ([12.177.129.25]:65475 "EHLO ccure.user-mode-linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261419AbUD3Vfw (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:35:52 -0400 Message-Id: <200404302217.i3UMHdml004610@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.1-RC1 To: Shailabh cc: Rik van Riel , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel , ckrm-tech Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [RFC] Revised CKRM release In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:47:44 EDT." <4092AD60.1030809@watson.ibm.com> References: <20040430174117.A13372@infradead.org> <4092AD60.1030809@watson.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:17:39 -0400 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 613 Lines: 15 nagar@watson.ibm.com said: > Jeff, do you have any numbers for UML overhead in 2.6 ? It obviously depends on the workload, but for "normal" things, like kernel builds and web serving, it's generally in the 20-30% range. That can be reduced, since I haven't spent too much time on tuning. I'm aiming for the teens, and I don't think that'll be too hard. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/