Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265126AbUFBHnQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 03:43:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265134AbUFBHnQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 03:43:16 -0400 Received: from smtp813.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.170.83]:41052 "HELO smtp813.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265126AbUFBHnM (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 03:43:12 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] Raw access to serio ports (1/2) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:43:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bilotta78@hotpop.com, danlee@informatik.uni-freiburg.de, vojtech@suse.cz, tuukkat@ee.oulu.fi References: <200406020218.42979.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <20040602003626.4d754944.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040602003626.4d754944.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406020243.09560.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1416 Lines: 51 On Wednesday 02 June 2004 02:36 am, Andrew Morton wrote: > Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Below is an implementation of rawdev driver. > > Yes, it does appear that we need the feature, thanks. > > > Comments? > > They're the thingies inside /* and */. Your patch is refreshingly free of > them ;) > > > +static ssize_t rawdev_write(struct file *file, const char *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *ppos) > > +{ > > + struct rawdev_list *list = file->private_data; > > + ssize_t written = 0; > > + int retval; > > + unsigned char c; > > + > > + retval = down_interruptible(&rawdev_sem); > > + if (retval) > > + return retval; > > + > > + if (!list->rawdev->serio) { > > + retval = -ENODEV; > > + goto out; > > + } > > The return values here are mucked up - this function returns `written'. Or an error code in negative notation - it's the standard practice for read/write. Am I missing something? > > > + if (count > 32) > > + count = 32; > > Why? (Don't tell me - add a comment!) I have no idea - taken from 2.4... My best guess would be it's an attempt not to hog the device... I'll sprinkle some comments ;) -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/