Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 02:55:48 +1000
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: "Peter J. Braam" <braam@clusterfs.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, axboe@suse.de,
       lmb@suse.de, kevcorry@us.ibm.com, arjanv@redhat.com,
       iro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no,
       lustre-devel@clusterfs.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Lustre VFS patch, version 2
Message-ID: <20040604165548.GC20820@krispykreme>
References: <20040602231554.ADC7B3100AE@moraine.clusterfs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040602231554.ADC7B3100AE@moraine.clusterfs.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 669
Lines: 18

 
> 10. "Have these patches undergone any siginifant test?" by Anton Blanchard:
>  
> There are two important questions I think: 
> - Do the patches cause damage?
>    Probably not anymore. SUSE has done testing and it appears the
>    original patch I attached didn't break things (after one fix was
>    made).

IBM did a lot of the work on that issue and it took the better part of a 
week to find, fix and verify.

Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/