Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266000AbUFDVSb (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:18:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266004AbUFDVSa (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:18:30 -0400 Received: from clever.eusc.inter.net ([213.73.101.4]:32427 "EHLO clever.eusc.inter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266000AbUFDVS2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:18:28 -0400 Message-ID: <40C0E91D.9070900@scienion.de> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 23:26:53 +0200 From: Sebastian Kloska User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: APM realy sucks on 2.6.x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1922 Lines: 59 Hi I'm really having a hard time with APM on 2.6.x. I have a DELL Latitude L400 with the newest BIOS release. The most important functionality of APM for me is the 'suspend to RAM' function which worked like it should on all 2.4.x kernels I've tested. Under 2.6.x it simply does not resume the second time. Meaning it suspends and resumes once but when suspending the second time the machine only brings up the LEDs and FAN and is stucked. I've modified the kernel option for APM but that did not help at all. I've already stated that question here and googled my fingers down to the bones. The discussion always goes in these directions: (1) Wait until ACPI is fully functional. Although a lot of people claim that there are a lot of BIOses around that do not implement it properly and that even MS-evel Windows has its problems with it. (2) Exchange the motherboard. (3) Buy a decent computer. (4) Stick with 2.4.x (5) And so on and so forth All of this is not very constructive. My impression is that APM is slowly degenerating while ACPI is not (yet ?) able to fill the gap. The suspend feature of ACPI is stated to be dangerous and experimental and does not work for me at all. After all this bashing... Is there anyone out there who has the same experiences ? Is there a workaround ? Is it possible to somehow downgrade APM in the 2.6 kernel to the 2.4.x state ? How could one debug this kind of missbehaviour ? Where do I have to look for potential miss configurations of the system ? I'm really willing to help the APM developers to track down this bug but don't have a clue how to debug this kind stuff. Thanks for your attention Sebastian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/