Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 00:14:56 +0100
From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: perex@suse.cz, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ASLA design, depth of code review and lack thereof
Message-ID: <20040604231456.GS12308@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
References: <20040604230819.GR12308@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040604230819.GR12308@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 958
Lines: 28

On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 12:08:19AM +0100, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
> Ladies and gentlemen, may I politely ask what description would fit somebody
> who have made the following
> 
>         case SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_FLOAT_BE:
>         {
>                 union {
>                         float f;
>                         u_int32_t i;
>                 } u;
>                 u.f = 0.0;
> #ifdef SNDRV_LITTLE_ENDIAN
>                 return bswap_32(u.i);
> #else
>                 return u.i;
> #endif
>         }
> and quite a few similar, er, wonders an ioctl?

... immediately followed by a self-LART - it's still an ugly code, all
right, but that's not an ioctl.

My apologies to everyone.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/