Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 02:31:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 02:31:49 -0500 Received: from slc181.modem.xmission.com ([166.70.9.181]:32517 "EHLO flinx.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 02:31:43 -0500 To: Ion Badulescu Cc: Marc Lehmann , Tim Riker , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: non-gcc linux? In-Reply-To: <200011052326.eA5NQGm16983@moisil.dev.hydraweb.com> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 05 Nov 2000 23:34:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: Ion Badulescu's message of "Sun, 5 Nov 2000 15:26:16 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ion Badulescu writes: > On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 23:42:25 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 04:06:37PM -0500, Jakub Jelinek > wrote: > > > >> for SGI, or SGI would have to be willing to assign some code to FSF. > > > > Which is the standard procedure that the FSF requires for all it's > > programs to be able to defend them > > ... or sell them under a different license. Not that they would, but they > could, if they really wanted to. The wording of the standard copyright assignment to the FSF binds the FSF so that it can only release the code under a free software license. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/