Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263089AbUFFIeu (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jun 2004 04:34:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263088AbUFFIet (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jun 2004 04:34:49 -0400 Received: from mtvcafw.sgi.com ([192.48.171.6]:34659 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263089AbUFFIef (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jun 2004 04:34:35 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 01:40:25 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: mikpe@csd.uu.se, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, ak@muc.de, ashok.raj@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, jbarnes@sgi.com, joe.korty@ccur.com, manfred@colorfullife.com, colpatch@us.ibm.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation Message-Id: <20040606014025.1bc75433.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040605082647.GQ21007@holomorphy.com> References: <20040603101010.4b15734a.pj@sgi.com> <1086313667.29381.897.camel@bach> <40BFD839.7060101@yahoo.com.au> <20040603221854.25d80f5a.pj@sgi.com> <16576.16748.771295.988065@alkaid.it.uu.se> <20040604090314.56d64f4d.pj@sgi.com> <20040604165601.GC21007@holomorphy.com> <20040604170542.576b4243.pj@sgi.com> <20040605013139.GM21007@holomorphy.com> <20040605010444.6a384e6c.pj@sgi.com> <20040605082647.GQ21007@holomorphy.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1063 Lines: 26 William Lee Irwin III wrote: > or whatever someone can be arsed to consider a better idea. If anyone lurking feels the urge to drive this puppy home, jump in. I'm unavailable, and from what I can guess reading between William's lines, he's not signed up either. Be forewarned - it's an area that can generate some long lkml threads ;). Both William and I seem to have an ample supply of keystrokes. > a user ABI change in a stable series, would be unfriendly I agree. While I contemplated such, I don't recall advocating such, for the reason you state. We're stuck at least for now with the sched_(set/get)affinity ABI. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/