Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:57:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:57:02 -0400 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:54288 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:56:51 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200104111656.UAA08925@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: Bug report: tcp staled when send-q != 0, timers == 0. To: berd@elf.ihep.su (Eugene B. Berdnikov) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:56:41 +0400 (MSK DST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20010411141645.B12573@elf.ihep.su> from "Eugene B. Berdnikov" at Apr 11, 1 02:16:45 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > At last, I tried several MTUs on 3d computer, running "right" 2.2.17, and > could not find conditions, under which any loss of ACKs can be detected. 8)8)8) ppp also inclined to the mss/mtu bug, it allocates too large buffers and never breaks them. The difference between kernels looks funny, but I think it finds explanation in differences between mss/mtu's. Alexey [ I will be absent since tomorrow for some time. ] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/