Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 02:46:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 02:46:10 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:16320 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 02:45:58 -0500 Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 23:30:41 -0800 Message-Id: <200011060730.XAA31897@pizda.ninka.net> From: "David S. Miller" To: oxymoron@waste.org CC: barryn@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: (message from Oliver Xymoron on Mon, 6 Nov 2000 01:34:14 -0600 (CST)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] document ECN in 2.4 Configure.help In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 01:34:14 -0600 (CST) From: Oliver Xymoron I'm still not sure why it's been decided not to do fallback or how this whole situation is any different from path MTU discovery. We don't use fallbacks for path MTU discovery (I assume you are referring to black hole detection, we don't do it, never have never will), you have to explicitly turn path-mtu discovery off. It's been on by default for 3 or 4 years now :-) Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/