From: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de
Organization: linutronix
To: Greg Weeks <greg.weeks@timesys.com>,
       linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4] jffs2 aligment problems
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:36:53 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <40C484F9.20504@timesys.com>
In-Reply-To: <40C484F9.20504@timesys.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200406071736.53101.tglx@linutronix.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1107
Lines: 25

On Monday 07 June 2004 17:08, Greg Weeks wrote:
> This fixed some jffs2 alignment problems we saw on an IXP425 based
> XScale board. I just got pinged that I was supposed to post this patch
> in case anyone else finds it usefull. This was against a modified 2.4.19
> kernel.

Enable CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP instead of tweaking the code. 
JFFS2 / MTD must be allowed to do unaligned access

-- 
Thomas
________________________________________________________________________
Steve Ballmer quotes the statistic that IT pros spend 70 percent of their 
time managing existing systems. That couldn’t have anything to do with 
the fact that 99 percent of these systems run Windows, could it?
________________________________________________________________________
linutronix - competence in embedded & realtime linux
http://www.linutronix.de
mail: tglx@linutronix.de

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/