Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264819AbUFHFsw (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 01:48:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264826AbUFHFsw (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 01:48:52 -0400 Received: from dragnfire.mtl.istop.com ([66.11.160.179]:63936 "EHLO dsl.commfireservices.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264819AbUFHFsv (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 01:48:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 01:50:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Phy Prabab Cc: Andrew Morton , kernel@kolivas.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staircase Scheduler v6.3 for 2.6.7-rc2 In-Reply-To: <20040608054200.66080.qmail@web51803.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <20040608054200.66080.qmail@web51803.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 742 Lines: 19 yOn Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Phy Prabab wrote: > The test case is a build system that links headers (ln > -s) and runs bison and flex on a couple of files. > strace shows no difference between running on 2.4.23 > compared to running on 2.6.7-rc2bk8s63. > > Unfortuneately, I can not send this out, but I am > trying to get a tet case that will demostrate this. > > In the mean time, what can I do to try understand this > slowdown? Whether the regression is also present without the staircase scheduler. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/