Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264873AbUFHHSc (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 03:18:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264876AbUFHHSc (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 03:18:32 -0400 Received: from mail.donpac.ru ([80.254.111.2]:22681 "EHLO donpac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264873AbUFHHSa (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 03:18:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:18:28 +0400 From: Andrey Panin To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.7-rc2-mm2 Message-ID: <20040608071828.GC19170@pazke> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040603015356.709813e9.akpm@osdl.org> <20040607124125.GT3776@pazke> <20040607220157.1e67ec39.akpm@osdl.org> <20040608051808.GA19170@pazke> <20040607222513.6bebcbb6.akpm@osdl.org> <20040608063417.GB19170@pazke> <20040607234235.1728f826.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040607234235.1728f826.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-SMTP-Authenticated: pazke@donpac.ru (cram) X-SMTP-TLS: TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1609 Lines: 52 --1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 159, 06 07, 2004 at 11:42:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Andrey Panin wrote: > > > > > Thanks. Could you please regenerate a new diff? The last one I had > > > doesn't seem to apply. > >=20 > > Patch rediffed agains 2.6.7-rc2-mm2 attached. >=20 > Thanks, that works. >=20 > It would be good if you could convert a couple of the existing dmi checks > over to this API. That way people can see how to use them and we know th= at > the new code is getting some exercise. > Choosing some commonly-used table entries would be best. Do you remember the reason of dropping my previous DMI patchset ? ;)=20 I can do it again, but this conversion will lead to new reject horrors, due to changes in cursed dmi_blacklist array. =20 Best regards. --=20 Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator pazke@donpac.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net --1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAxWhDby9O0+A2ZecRAhnRAJ0TZNFLpN+oEaqzl0YtAsYH2Kk+ZwCbBhi1 BjibDrloKWMVNAslhwN1IAs= =zqtn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/