Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:06:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:06:41 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:6928 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:06:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 17:06:24 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel To: Miles Lane Cc: Matti Aarnio , LKML Subject: Re: 2.5 module development mailing list needed? [Fwd: Linux Security Module Interface] In-Reply-To: <3AD48F4F.1000800@megapathdsl.net> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Miles Lane wrote: > Matti Aarnio wrote: > > Proper place to do this discussion is linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > It sounds good in theory. In practice, though, almost all of the > design discussions have been occuring in private e-mail. Actually, I tried to setup a mailing list (linux-future@nl.linux.org) for discussions about future ideas for Linux, etc... In practice most discussions just came back to linux-kernel or to subsystem lists every once in a while. If you feel you want to ramble about long-term ideas or random OS ideas you think might be cool to have in Linux sometime in the future, feel free to use that list I made (it's still around), but most serious discussion will end up here sooner or later ... regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/