Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265812AbUFIQ1b (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:27:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265828AbUFIQ1b (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:27:31 -0400 Received: from fmr05.intel.com ([134.134.136.6]:20692 "EHLO hermes.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265812AbUFIQ13 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:27:29 -0400 From: Mark Gross Organization: Intel To: Pavel Machek , Mark Gross Subject: Re: swsusp "not enough swap space" 2.6.5-mm6. Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:27:51 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200406080829.35120.mgross@linux.intel.com> <20040608230450.GA13916@elf.ucw.cz> <200406090832.04064.mgross@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <200406090832.04064.mgross@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406090927.51206.mgross@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1768 Lines: 49 On Wednesday 09 June 2004 08:32, Mark Gross wrote: > On Tuesday 08 June 2004 16:04, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > I'm sorry for not having more information, but the failing computer is > > > my home laptop (I'll get more details after work or I'll bring it in > > > tomorrow for more details). > > > > > > Anyway, this thing does software suspend using the 2.6.2-mm1 kernel, > > > and last night I was updating it to 2.6.5-mm6, and I started getting > > > these not enough disk space errors. > > > > > > I found your bug fix patch, > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107806008626357&w=2 > > > and checked that it is included in the 2.6.5-mm6 kernel I'm using. > > > > > > Without more information does this problem ring any bells? > > > > > > Can you recommend a "good" kernel version that does reliable swsusp? > > > > Get 2.6.6, and set swappiness to 100. > > > > Pavel > > 2.6.6 still fails, just like the failure reported by the thread independent > of swappiness: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=107806010900002&r=1&w=2 > > However; as hinted in the thread turning off premption does seem to fix the > problem. > Spoke too soon. My build tree that had the success was 2.6.6-mm6, so I re-built a clean 2.6.6 from tarball using the .config from the successful run, CONFIG_PREEMPT=n. It fails. 2.6.6-mm5 works, but only if CONFIG_PREEMPT=n. I have to get to my day job now, but whats up with the flakieness of the swsusp? Shouldn't it be mostly working by now? --mgross - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/