Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265863AbUFITYL (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:24:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265864AbUFITYL (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:24:11 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com ([24.94.166.115]:13215 "EHLO ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265863AbUFITYB (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:24:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 14:23:58 -0500 From: cbjohns@mn.rr.com Subject: Re: kswapd excessive CPU time To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-to: cbjohns@mn.rr.com Message-id: <6feb8721a0.721a06feb8@rdc-kc.rr.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 810 Lines: 25 > Recent 2.4 VM should fix this, but you better of use 2.6. > Thanks Marcelo. Do you know of specific patches that have gone into 2.4 that might fix this? I may be able to just apply them rather than try a whole new kernel release. Thanks, Chris > > > > My question boils down to this: given the (simple) scenario below, > > am I missing critical VM/kswapd patches, or is this behavior > > expected and OK, or is it wrong and possibly fixed in the 2.6 > kernel?> Or is the kswapd behavior somehow tunable to avoid the > apparent> thrashing that I saw? > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/