Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261939AbUFJQQh (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:16:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262065AbUFJQQc (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:16:32 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:21466 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261939AbUFJQPs (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:15:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 09:14:42 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Dmitry Torokhov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Couple of sysfs patches Message-ID: <20040610161442.GC31787@kroah.com> References: <20040610144658.31403.qmail@web81309.mail.yahoo.com> <20040610170607.A5830@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040610170607.A5830@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 917 Lines: 24 On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 05:06:07PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > Now that I can see the platform device interfaces multipling like rabbits, > (to GregKH) I think that the patch I submitted for platform_add_device > suffers from this problem as well, and I should've thrown that code > into platform_register_device itself. > > Greg - comments? Would you like a new patch which does that, or do you > think that's too risky? Hm, I don't think it's too risky. Make up a patch and let's see how it looks. I'm just worried that this "simple" interface really isn't so simple, as it's almost just as much work to manage it as a normal platform device. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/