Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263415AbUFJXi0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:38:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263429AbUFJXiZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:38:25 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:57498 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263415AbUFJXiQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:38:16 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Lars Subject: Re: 2.6.7-rc3: nforce2, no C1 disconnect fixup applied Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:38:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200406110035.48711.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <200406110123.36981.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9e7ff0c.dip.t-dialin.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 694 Lines: 22 aha! just learned something new :) looks good to me. thanks again for your time, lars >> its my understanding that >> 0x9F01FF01 enables c1 and fix >> 0x0F01FF01 disables c1, enables fix >> 0x0F0FFF01 disables c1 and fix >> >> am i right ? > > Yes but doing & should always give the right result: > 0x0F0FFF01 & 0x9F01FF01 -> 0x0F01FF01 > (disabled -> disabled + fix) > 0x9F0FFF01 & 0x9F01FF01 -> 0x9F01FF01 > (enabled -> enabled + fix) > ... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/