Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263971AbUFKOHx (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:07:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263963AbUFKOHx (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:07:53 -0400 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.194]:62086 "EHLO mail.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263943AbUFKOHv (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:07:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:07:22 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: Rik van Riel Cc: John Bradford , Matt Mackall , Christian Borntraeger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lasse K?rkk?inen / Tronic Subject: Re: Some thoughts about cache and swap Message-ID: <20040611140721.GB7369@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <200406091932.i59JWh0N000383@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 870 Lines: 24 On Wed, 9 June 2004 15:32:41 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Haven't seen many of those, to be honest. The majority > of the VM problems I get to see are people running a > workload the kernel didn't expect - a workload the kernel > wasn't prepared to handle... Is there a list of those different workloads somewhere? And I don't mean in your head. ;) All I notive in my personal use is the cache flushing effect from use-once data. If that was the whole list, it should be easy enough to fix. J?rn -- "Security vulnerabilities are here to stay." -- Scott Culp, Manager of the Microsoft Security Response Center, 2001 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/