Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264704AbUFLKUB (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2004 06:20:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264705AbUFLKUA (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2004 06:20:00 -0400 Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.236]:11100 "EHLO pfepb.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264704AbUFLKT7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2004 06:19:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] -ar patchset From: Redeeman To: LKML Mailinglist In-Reply-To: <20040612023928.A103F23C03@ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com> References: <20040612023928.A103F23C03@ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1087035598.10652.1.camel@redeeman.kaspersandberg.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:19:58 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 987 Lines: 23 On Sat, 2004-06-12 at 04:39, Pokey the Penguin wrote: > > find the initial version of the patch, with staircase, > > autoregulate-swappiness, supermount-ng, ext3 and reiser improvements, and a > > I gather that supermount-ng is now quite dated and no longer maintained. Is > submount (http://submount.sourceforge.net/) not the current favourite to > provide such functionality? > > Looking at the two, submount definitely seems more ready for inclusion based > on its non-invasive approach. i believe that having the automounting inside the kernel is a bad idea. i think there should be more people using HAL and D-BUS, together with a userspace automounter. like ivman, http://ivman.sf.net -- Regards, Redeeman redeeman@metanurb.dk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/