Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 04:45:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 04:45:37 -0400 Received: from smtp1.cern.ch ([137.138.128.38]:11023 "EHLO smtp1.cern.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 04:45:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 10:45:13 +0200 From: Jamie Lokier To: watermodem Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: No 100 HZ timer ! Message-ID: <20010412104513.D25536@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> In-Reply-To: <3AD53C66.92B8D6BE@ameritech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AD53C66.92B8D6BE@ameritech.net>; from aquamodem@ameritech.net on Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 12:25:58AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org watermodem wrote: > As somebody who is now debating how to measure latencies in a > giga-bit ethernet environment with several components doing > L3 switching in much less than 10 micro-seconds ... (hardware) > I agree that some method is need to achieve higher resolutions. > (Sigh... I will likely need to buy something big and expensive) > {this is for a system to make use of L. Yarrow's little protocol} Use Alteon/Netgear cards, everyone else seems to be :-) We get measurements on the order of 100ns, if we are just measuring network latencies. (Data is not transferred over the PCI bus). -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/