Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264873AbUFLQoI (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:44:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264874AbUFLQoI (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:44:08 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:10905 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264873AbUFLQoE (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:44:04 -0400 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] O_NOATIME support Organization: Deban GNU/Linux Homesite In-Reply-To: <20040612011129.GD1967@flower.home.cesarb.net> X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.7.4-20040225 ("Benbecula") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.5 (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:44:01 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2753 Lines: 55 In article <20040612011129.GD1967@flower.home.cesarb.net> you wrote: > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-arm/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:36:55.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-arm26/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:37:42.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-cris/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:37:59.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-h8300/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:38:16.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-i386/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:38:26.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-ia64/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:38:38.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-m68k/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:38:49.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-mips/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:39:12.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 0x40000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-parisc/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:40:03.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 04000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-ppc/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:40:14.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-ppc64/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:40:25.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-s390/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:40:42.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-sh/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:40:52.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-sparc/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:41:14.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 0x200000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-sparc64/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:41:27.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 0x200000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-v850/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:41:56.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 > +++ linux-2.6.6/include/asm-x86_64/fcntl.h 2004-06-10 18:42:13.000000000 -0300 > +#define O_NOATIME 01000000 This is less related to your patch (i like this feature!) but more to the current source layout: is there a reason for not sharing those open flags on an non architecture specific file? And should you not try to use the same value on all architectures to make that especially easy to change later? Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/