Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 05:16:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 05:16:00 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:23818 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 05:15:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 10:06:40 +0100 From: Russell King To: Steven Walter Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] serial ioctl not returning with 2.4.3 Message-ID: <20010412100640.A22907@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010411142538.A27290@hapablap.dyn.dhs.org> <3AD4C38D.2C970A60@mandrakesoft.com> <20010411173642.A29791@hapablap.dyn.dhs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010411173642.A29791@hapablap.dyn.dhs.org>; from srwalter@yahoo.com on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 05:36:42PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 05:36:42PM -0500, Steven Walter wrote: > It would appear that way, if not for something I neglected to mention in > my first message--the ioctl is on the fd for the opened serial port. > This succeeds in other version of the kernel (as described in my > original posting) and so must somehow be valid for the serial driver. > > Any more thoughts? This would seem to be a definite bug in the serial > code. I've got an old copy of agetty here (about '95) which I'll try on 2.4. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/