Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265383AbUFOJVw (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:21:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265396AbUFOJVw (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:21:52 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:18085 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265383AbUFOJVu (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:21:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 02:12:19 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Jean Tourrilhes Cc: Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [3/12] remove irda usage of isa_virt_to_bus() Message-ID: <20040615091219.GR1444@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Jean Tourrilhes , Linux kernel mailing list References: <20040615014344.GA17657@bougret.hpl.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040615014344.GA17657@bougret.hpl.hp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1695 Lines: 34 On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 06:43:44PM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > Could you please send this directly to me. I hate scrubbing > large patches from the mailing list archive. > Note that before even thinking of pushing this patch in the > kernel, we need to perform testing with the hardware on i386 and > potentially on ARM. The author only tried with irtty that doesn't use > this function, so that's not a valid test at all. Finding people test > those changes is going to be tough, as usual. > I'm also wondering about the validity of those changes, but > that's another matter I need to go through. During 2.5.X, some people > assured me that using isa_virt_to_bus was safe on all platform with an > ISA bus... Okay, well, I myself didn't produce this, and I couldn't tell offhand if it was bogus or not. I presumed bugreporter made happy and spraying it across the debian userbase was enough to verify it at runtime. From what you're telling me, this is not the case. Can you recommend people to do this kind of testing? Apparently people aren't entirely happy with "dump it on lkml and wait for an ack or nak", which I've noted for future reference, but probably won't have a need to consider again (it's very rare that I have to deal with changes I didn't write myself or are otherwise in areas I don't have much knowledge about). OTOH, it was easier to find than buried in a distro BTS and/or cvs, not that that makes it ideal. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/