Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266035AbUFPAiM (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:38:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266038AbUFPAiM (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:38:12 -0400 Received: from conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.54]:26758 "EHLO conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266035AbUFPAiJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:38:09 -0400 From: Eric Reply-To: eric@cisu.net To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: more files with licenses that aren't GPL-compatible Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:38:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040615205753.GA24380@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20040615205753.GA24380@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406151938.02613.eric@cisu.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1664 Lines: 35 On Tuesday 15 June 2004 03:57 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > While I don't want to jump into the usual Debian wankfest whether Linux > as GPL'ed project can distribute hex-images of firmware at all there are > a few firmware C headers files that have a license statement that aren't > GPL-compatible at all, namely the keyspan firmware in > drivers/usb/serial/keyspan*_fw.h with the following license text: --*snip*-- > Permission is hereby granted for the distribution of this firmware > image as part of a Linux or other Open Source operating system kernel > in text or binary form as required. > This firmware may not be modified and may only be used with > Keyspan hardware. Distribution and/or Modification of the > keyspan.c driver which includes this firmware, in whole or in > part, requires the inclusion of this statement." > ---------------------------- snip ---------------------------- > > which makes the kernel as whole unredistributable. A similar license > was according to Greg also recently granted for > drivers/usb/misc/emi62_fw_*.h which currently has even worse license > statements in there. Unredistributable? Am I mistaken? It says permission is given to redistribute this piece as part of the linux kernel. You just can't modify it. Although it is unquestionably not a very permissive license, it's inclusion is not detrimental to the kernel. Please correct me if I am wrong. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/