Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 04:40:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 04:39:54 -0500 Received: from smtp1.jp.psi.net ([154.33.63.111]:15377 "EHLO smtp1.jp.psi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 04:39:45 -0500 From: "Rainer Mager" To: Subject: OOPS when using 4GB memory setting Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:33:59 +0900 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, Please respond directly since I'm not on this mailing list. I have 2 intertwined problems that my initial web research has failed to reveal help. I recently upgraded machines and the new one has 1GB RAM. If I build a 2.4.0pre10 (or 8 or 9, I haven't tried earlier) kernel and chose the 1GB memory setting then only 900504 K is detected (but everything runs stably). If I chose the 4GB memory setting then the full 1 G is detected but I get oops. I can reliably force an oops by mounting a samba drive and then accessing it (via ls for example). So, is this a known issue? Should I do an oops analysis? What can I do to fix this? Also 2 items of note. The kernel that comes RetHat 6.2 detects all of the RAM and is stable. Related to this, although not that important, I also noticed that via this RedHad kernel, hdparm shows memory access (not disk) of over 200 MB/s. On my 2.4 kernels this is about 120MB/s. Any ideas why? Second, it is a dual PIII system so is an SMP kernel, if that makes a difference. Any help would be greatly appreciated. --Rainer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/