Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:49:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:49:06 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:54544 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:48:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:48:13 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel To: Alexander Viro Cc: Jan Harkes , Andreas Dilger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Fwd: Re: memory usage - dentry_cacheg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: > IOW. keeping dcache/icache size low is not a good thing, unless you > have a memory pressure that requires it. More agressive kupdate _is_ > a good thing, though - possibly kupdate sans flushing buffers, so that > it would just keep the icache clean and let bdflush do the actual IO. Very well. Then I'll leave the balancing between eating from the page cache and eating from the dcache/icache to you. Have fun. Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/