Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 04:39:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 04:39:04 -0500 Received: from [62.254.209.2] ([62.254.209.2]:4856 "EHLO cam-gw.zeus.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 04:38:56 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:38:53 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Landamore To: Thomas Pollinger cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] TCP/IP weirdness in 2.2.15 In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20001103173708.034fb360@stargate> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thomas, On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Thomas Pollinger wrote: > Running a 'cvs get' on the Linux clients of a larger source tree > eventually hangs the client in the middle of the get process. The > hang is *always* reproduceable (however it does not always hang at > the same place, sometimes after 1', sometimes after 5' to > 10'). Several runs on Win NT did not show this problem. [...] > At last, I tried to do the same on another HP-UX box and there was > no blocking at all. > > What is interesting to know is that between the HP-UX server and the > HP client is a Linux router with a 3c905 card, 2.2.14 kernel. Let me see if I understand this correct: Client Router Server ------------------------------------ Linux Linux HPUX Bad WinNT Linux HPUX Good HPUX Linux HPUX Good With all Linux boxes version 2.2.something Is this correct? This is slightly different from my situation; I had a Linux client and Linux server directly connected to the same switch (3Com Superstack II, FWIW) I found the client always hung in my test; this was only visible at the end of a SPEC run. Analysing tcpdump etc showed that in fact it died somewhere early in the test, almost always before 10 minutes worth of run. In the end I 'fixed' the problem by using a HPUX server :-/ ... I observe that there _are_ some SPECweb99 submissions with Linux (the Tux result), I'm curious to know if the people who actually did the test run experienced any problems... Perhaps if I get time I'll repeat the experiment with (a) the most recent Alan pre-2.2 kernel and (b) the most recent 2.4-test kernel... I'll re-iterate my original request, which was not "it's broke - can you fix it" but was "okay, how do I go about tracking this one down?" cheers, stephen -- Stephen Landamore, Zeus Technology Tel: +44 1223 525000 Universally Serving the Net Fax: +44 1223 525100 http://www.zeus.com Zeus Technology, Zeus House, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0ZT, ENGLAND - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/