Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265474AbUFSKbM (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jun 2004 06:31:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265476AbUFSKbL (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jun 2004 06:31:11 -0400 Received: from mailout11.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.85]:53482 "EHLO mailout11.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265474AbUFSKbK (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jun 2004 06:31:10 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040619122933.00afee60@pop.t-online.de> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 12:32:32 +0200 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: margitsw@t-online.de (Margit Schubert-While) Subject: wmb versus smp_wmb Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Seen: false X-ID: SraeRUZGZeqJyCR+KrOaER-TcbEbnjdNpRuhNoq++LQiV+Q3FOhXol Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 330 Lines: 11 As the $SUBJECT implies, when should one use wmb() versus smp_wmb() ? Thanks Margit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/