Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:52:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:52:03 -0400 Received: from balu.sch.bme.hu ([152.66.224.40]:48536 "EHLO balu.sch.bme.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:51:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 00:51:30 +0200 From: Pozsar Balazs To: Rik van Riel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [test-PATCH] Re: [QUESTION] 2.4.x nice level Message-ID: <20010413005130.A4438@balu.sch.bme.hu> Mail-Followup-To: Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 12:53:16PM -0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 12:53:16PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > OK, here it is. It's nothing like montavista's singing-dancing > > scheduler patch that does all, just a really minimal change that > > should stretch the nice levels to yield the following CPU usage: > > > > Nice 0 5 10 15 19 > > %CPU 100 56 25 6 1 > > PID USER PRI NI SIZE SWAP RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 980 riel 17 0 296 0 296 240 R 54.1 0.5 54:19 loop > 1005 riel 16 5 296 0 296 240 R N 27.0 0.5 0:34 loop > 1006 riel 17 10 296 0 296 240 R N 13.5 0.5 0:16 loop > 1007 riel 18 15 296 0 296 240 R N 4.5 0.5 0:05 loop > 987 riel 20 19 296 0 296 240 R N 0.4 0.5 0:25 loop How does this scale to negative nice levels? Afaik it should, in some way. (I don't mean that it's wrong in this state, i'm just asking). regards, Balazs. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/