From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] New set of input patches
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:17:29 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
Cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
References: <20040618203340.45436.qmail@web81301.mail.yahoo.com> <20040619200532.GB20632@lug-owl.de>
In-Reply-To: <20040619200532.GB20632@lug-owl.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200406192217.29206.dtor_core@ameritech.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1394
Lines: 33

On Saturday 19 June 2004 03:05 pm, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-06-18 13:33:40 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
> wrote in message <20040618203340.45436.qmail@web81301.mail.yahoo.com>:
> > > However, they won't apply onto Linus' tree and cause rejects in a good
> > > number of "interesting" files.
> > 
> > Well, I do not consider it tested enough to be ready for Linus yet :)
> > I am thinking about publushing my input-sysfs bk tree... Will there
> > be an interest in it or you just want a patch against the vanilla 2.6.7?
> > I can do a wholesale patch but splitting my changes from other stuff in
> > Vojtech's tree does not sound very appealing... 
> 
> As I said, I'd love to see a -linus based patch, simply because I
> basically work with exactly this as my base. However, I can also try to
> get another base to start from.
>

Ok, how about this:

http://www.geocities.com/dt_or/input/2_6_7/

00-bk-input.patch.gz and 00-bk-sysfs.patch.gz are pulls from Vojtech's and
Greg's threes diffed against 2.6.7 - that's what I use as a baseline.

The rest of the patches are the ones that I posted earlier. 

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/