Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:12:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:12:05 -0500 Received: from Cantor.suse.de ([194.112.123.193]:38666 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 06:11:56 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:11:53 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Alan Cox Cc: Andrew Morton , Oliver Xymoron , barryn@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH] document ECN in 2.4 Configure.help Message-ID: <20001106121153.A14104@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <3A068C00.272BD5D2@uow.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:02:47AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:02:47AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > with the TCP ECN_ECHO and CWR flags set, to indicate > > ECN-capability, then the sender should send its second > > SYN packet without these flags set. This is because > > Now that is nice. The end user perceived effect is that folks with faulty > firewalls have horrible slow web sites with a 3 or 4 second wait for each > page. The perfect incentive. If only someone could do the same to path mtu > discovery incompetents. And it penalizes good guys. If the host cannot answer to the first SYN for some legitimate reason then it'll never be able to use ECN. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/